Effects of neuron specific amaygdala lesions on fear- motivated behavior in rats

Finn Konow Jellestad

Institute of Physiological Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway. June 1986


CONTENTS

Acknowledgement

Introduction

General summary

Conclusions

Paper 1: Ursin, H., Jellestad, F. and Cabrera, I.G. The Amygdala, Exploration and Fear. In: The Amygdaloid Complex, edited by Y. Ben-Ari. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland, 1981, pp. 317-329. Summary

Paper 2: Jellestad, F.K. and Cabrera, I.G. Exploration and avoidance learning after ibotenic acid and radio frequency lesions in the rat amygdala. In press, Behavioral and Neural Biology, 1986. Summary

Paper 3: Jellestad, F.K. and Bakke, H.K. Passive avoidance after ibotenic acid and radio frequency lesions in the rat amygdala. Physiology & Behavior, 1965, 34. pp. 299-305. Summary

Paper 4: Jellestad, F.K., Markowska, A., Bakke, H.K. and Walther, B. Behavioral effects after ibotenic acid, 6-OHDA and electrolytic lesions in the central amygdala nucleus of the rat. Submitted to Physiology & Behavior, 1986. Summary

Paper 5: Jellestad, F.K. and Grahnstedt, 5. Electroencephalographic activity after kainic and ibotenic acid injections in the amygdaloid complex of rats. Brain Research, 1985, 340, pp. 229-234. Summary

Paper 6: Jellestad, F.K. and Murison, R.C.C. Stereotactic, electrical and chemical lesions. To appear in: Advanced Methods in Psychobiology, edited by J.N. Hingtgen, D. Hellhammer and G. Huppmann. Toronto: Hogrefe. Summary
 
 



 
 

GENERAL SUMMARY
PAPER I
This paper gives a general review of the literature concerning the amygdala complex and emotional behavior. Behavioral classifications of fear-induced behavior and criteria for neuroethological localization are discussed. It is concluded that both large amygdela lesions and small lesions of the central nucleus seem to reduce fear motivation or the activation effects of threat stimuli at least in rats. It is pointed out, however, that the specific role of the various emygdala nuclei for emotional behavior is difficult to evaluate since axons passing through the area are also destroyed with conventional lesion techniques.
 
 

PAPER II
Paper II contains descriptions of different experiments. The experiments were undertaken to evaluate the importance of amygdaloid neurons versus axons of passage in fear-motivated behavior. Open-field and avoidance behavior and plasma corticosterone levels were studied after intra-amygdala injections of IBO (3.Oug) and radio frequency (AF) lesions in the amygdala complex of male Wistar rats. The IBO lesions led to increased open-field activity, but no impairments in avoidance learning, or changes in basal or experimental levels of plasma corticosterone. In the one-way avoidance task the RF lesions, in contrast to the IBO lesions, led to significant impairments in the acquisition of the avoidance response and increased corticosterone levels. Even though the long-term axon sparing effect of IBO is questioned since cavities were detected eight weeks after the injections, the differences in avoidance learning and in corticosterone levels between the RF and the IBO lesions indicated that the axons were functionally active at the time of testing (14-26 days post operatively). The increase in open field is attributed to the destruction of amygdala neurons and neurons in the overlying cortex, while the active-avoidance deficit seems to depend on the destruction of axons. On the basis of the behavioral results and the corticosterone data in these experiments, it is suggested that the behavioral changes are not attributable to a general reduction in fear. However, since the IBO lesions did not affect the most medial parts of the amygdala complex including the central amygdala nucleus, it was suggested that the role of this nucleus in the arousal of fear had to be investigated further.
 
 

PAPER III
Since the long-term axon sparing effect of ibotenic acid was questioned in paper II, the effects of such lesions in the amygdala complex of rats were compared to those of RF lesions on a passive avoidance task in paper III. Both types of lesions impaired the acquisition of the passive avoidance response. Plasma corticosterone levels were measured after a retention test in which no electrical shocks were applied. None of the lesioned groups showed reduced corticosterone levels, the IBO lesioned rats actually showed significantly higher corticosterone levels than both RF lesioned and control animals. The corticosterone results are not consistent with a general reduction in fear. The slower passive avoidance learning may be a conditioning deficit due to impaired information processing in the damaged amygdala complex.
 
 

PAPER IV
The amygdala lesions reported in paper II and III were relatively large and the behavioral effects could be due to the destruction of the central amygdala nucleus as suggested in paper I. The results showed that both selective lesions of central amygdala neurons with ibotenic acid, and electrolytic destruction of the nucleus, led to marked increases in open field activity and general activity during passive avoidance conditioning. However, combined destruction of neurons and axons of passage led to more pronounced passive avoidance impairments and it was suggested that this effect should be attributed to neurons located outside the central amygdala nucleus. The corticosterone and the behavioral data indicated that general arousal of fear was not critically dependent an intact central amygdala neurons or intact cortico-hypothalamic fibers. The data were, however, still compatible with a hypothesis of temporary reduction of fear-arousal in the initial phase of the passive avoidance conditioning.
 
 

PAPER V
The most consistent findings in papers II, III and IV were a general increase in locomotor activity in spite of different lesion sizes and localizations. Since kainic acid (also a neuroexcitatory amino acid) is known to produce severe epileptic activity, the increases in locomotor activity after ibotenic acid injections could perhaps be due to subclinical epileptic discharges. In paper V, long-term electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and neuropathological effects were studied after unilateral amygdala injection of kainic (KA) or ibotenic acid (IBO). Injections of 0.2 ug KA caused severe epileptic activity which lasted up to post-operative day 49. Histological examination revealed complete losses of neuronal and glial elements that appeared as cavities within the injected areas. In contrast, the epileptiform activity after injections of 3.Oug IBO was seen only as interictal spikes which lasted for 2-4 h after surgery. Cavities within the lesion areas were also evident in the IBO-injected rats. The results indicated that KA should be avoided as a lesion method in behavioral studies of brain functions, whereas IBO was judged to be a more suitable lesion tool, which produced only minor and transitory epileptiform activity. However, neither KA nor IBO seemed to have long-term axon sparing properties in the amygdala complex within the range of the applied doses.
 
 

PAPER VI
This last paper is added to the thesis since it gives a general overview and extensive description of the various surgical techniques and procedures employed in paper II, III, IV and V. It gives a detailed description of various anaesthetics, stereotaxic equipment and stereotaxic brain atlases. Different procedures for calculating stereotaxic lesion coordinates are also described. Advantages and disadvantages of different lesions methods are discussed in addition to various factors like injection speed , volume , needle size, diffusion time etc , factors that all should be taken into consideration when producing chemical lesions.

opp LOGO

Dissertation Database - Bergen University Library